Bihar: ‘Balanced verdict, based on facts and evidences’
PATNA: Retired IPS officer and Mahavir Mandir Trust secretary Acharya Kishore Kunal, an author of two books on Ayodhya, has
been closely associated with the Ramjanmabhoomi case in the Supreme Court. He tells Ramashankar that the verdict is
balanced and appreciable. Excerpts:
How do you see the verdict? 
Archives – Final Combaind Title of the Hindu Deity
01. Janma Sthan is the place where Ram Lallaji is Virajman
02. The Janma Sthan is certainly a deity and a juristic person
03. There existed a temple on the disputed site
04. Worship of the Hindus continued even after the partial conversion of the Temple
05.The disputed shrine may be handed over to the Hindus under Islamic law
Archives – Final Combaind Title of the Mosque
06. Lord Canning confiscated the landed property on 3rd march, 1858
07. Most of the entries in Register 6 are fake and fabricated
08. Buchanan’s inscriptions are very important to detect the travel of fabricated inscriptions inside the disputed shrine
09. Babur had nothing to do with either the demolition of the temple or construction of the mosque
10. Mir Baqi of the inscriptions is different from Baqi (Shaghawal) Tashkindi in Babarnama
11. Many of other claims are based on erroneous facts
12. Aurangzeb demolished Rama temple and built a mosque thereon
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
